Mapping Malaysia's contribution to Gold Open Access: Growth patterns, disparities, and policy implications
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the growth of Gold Open Access (OA) research output in Malaysia through a bibliometric analysis using Web of Science (WoS) data. Over the past decade, Malaysia has seen a significant increase in gold OA publications, ranking 27th globally, 10th in Asia, and first in Southeast Asia. The analysis reveals that Science & Technology and Health Sciences dominate the gold OA landscape, while Arts & Humanities and Social Sciences remain underrepresented. Malaysian researchers predominantly publish their gold OA articles in international journals, with Switzerland-based publishers being particularly prominent. A notable finding is the impact of government restrictions on using research funds for publications with three specific publishers - MDPI, Hindawi, and Frontiers. In 2023, MDPI experienced a 25.4 percent decline in publications by Malaysian researchers, reflecting a shift in publication patterns due to these restrictions. Despite the overall growth, the study highlights a mismatch between the quantity of gold OA publications and their citation impact, raising questions about the broader influence of Malaysian gold OA research. These findings underscore the need for strategies to manage and promote gold OA publishing effectively while addressing the challenges posed by policy restrictions. The insights offer valuable guidance for researchers and policymakers to optimize the benefits of gold OA publishing in Malaysia.
Downloads
Article Details
It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to the journal have not been published, accepted for publication, nor simultaneously submitted for publication elsewhere. By submitting a manuscript, the author(s) agree that copyright for the article is transferred to the publisher, if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication.
References
Al-Marzouqi, A. H., & Arabi, A. A. (2022). Research performance of the GCC countries: A comparative analysis of quantity and quality. Heliyon, 8(11), e11309. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E11309.
Bailey, C. W. , Jr. (2006). What is open access? In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects (pp. 13–26). Chandos Publishing.
Basson, I., Blanckenberg, J. P., & Prozesky, H. (2021). Do open access journal articles experience a citation advantage? Results and methodological reflections of an application of multiple measures to an analysis by WoS subject areas. Scientometrics, 126(1), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03734-9.
Bautista-Puig, N., Lopez-Illescas, C., de Moya-Anegon, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., & Moed, H. F. (2020). Do journals flipping to gold open access show an OA citation or publication advantage? Scientometrics, 124(3), 2551–2575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03546-x.
Beall, J. (2017). What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029.
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. BOAI. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read/.
Cary, M., & Rockwell, T. (2020). International collaboration in open access publications: How income shapes international collaboration. Publications, 8(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8010013.
Chawla, D. S. (2023). Malaysia won’t pay for publishing in certain journals. C&EN Global Enterprise, 101(35), 13. https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10135-polcon1.
Collyer, F. M. (2018). Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, global South. Current Sociology, 66(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116680020.
Cruz, C. H. de B. (2023). Fostering collaboration: a study of scientific publications with authors in G20 countries. 4th. G20 Education Working Group Meeting. Ministry of Education, Government of India, Special Report Release. https://assets.ctfassets.net/zlnfaxb2lcqx/epSolmRHzr28rzUnxCl0a/04aa577cf83c02be0f9b814c7a53bfd0/G20-report-June-2023version-19th-July.pdf.
Curcic, D. (2023). Open access publishing statistics. Wordsrated. https://wordsrated.com/open-access-publishing-statistics/.
DOAJ. (2024). Directory of Open Access Journal. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/.
DOAJournals. (2020). What does DOAJ define as Open Access? DOAJ. https://blog.doaj.org/2020/11/17/what-does-doaj-define-as-open-access.
Eger, T., Mertens, A., & Scheufen, M. (2021). Publication cultures and the citation impact of open access. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(8), 1980–1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3429.
Gonzalez-Brambila CN, Reyes-Gonzalez L, Veloso F, Perez-Angón MA (2016) The scientific impact of developing nations. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0151328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151328.
Halevi, G., van Leeuwen, T. N., Milićević, N., & Fry, R. (2023). Gold open access output and expenditures in the United States in the past decade. 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023). https://doi.org/10.55835/64410a4a643beb0d90fc4707.
Heidbach, K., Knaus, J., Laut, I., & Palzenberger, M. (2022). Long term global trends in open access : A data paper. doi:10.17617/2.3361428.
Huang, C. K., Neylon, C., Brookes-Kenworthy, C., Hosking, R., Montgomery, L., Wilson, K., & Ozaygen, A. (2020). Comparison of bibliographic data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings. Quantitative Science Studies, 1 (2): 445–478 https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00031.
Huang, C. K., Neylon, C., Montgomery, L., Hosking, R., Diprose, J. P., Handcock, R. N., & Wilson, K. (2024). Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations. Scientometrics, 129(2), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04894-0.
International Institute for Management Development. (2019). IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2019. https://www.nesdc.go.th/article_attach/article_file_ 20191114160558.pdf.
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Pezzullo, A. M., & Boccia, S. (2023). The rapid growth of mega-journals: Threats and opportunities. JAMA, 329(15), 1253. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.3212.
Kipnis, D. G., & Brush, D. A. (2023). An investigation of gold open access publications of STEM faculty at a public university in the United States. Science & Technology Libraries, 42(4), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2023.2175103.
Larivière, V., Kiermer, V., MacCallum, C. J., McNutt, M., Patterson, M., Pulverer, B., Swaminathan, S., Taylor, S., & Curry, S. (2016). A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions. BioRxiv, 062109. https://doi.org/10.1101/062109.
Lee, S. (2021, January 5). The Chinese Academy of Sciences flags 65 ‘risky’ journals. Asian Scientist. https://www.asianscientist.com/2021/01/academia/chinese-academy-of-sciences-risky-journals/.
Low, W. Y., Ng, K. H., Kabir, M. A., Koh, A. P., & Sinnasamy, J. (2014). Trend and impact of international collaboration in clinical medicine papers published in Malaysia. Scientometrics, 98, 1521–1533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1121-6.
Masrek, M. N., & Yaakub, M. S. (2015). Intention to publish in open access journal: The case of Multimedia University Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3420–3427. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.01.1013.
McKenna, J. (2023). Open access in Spain. MDPI. https://blog.mdpi.com/2023/11/23/open-access-in-spain/.
MDPI. (2024). Annual report 2023. https://mdpi-res.com/data/2023_annual_report_mdpi.pdf?v=20240424.
Mukherjee, B. (2014). Green and gold open access in India. Learned Publishing, 27(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1087/20140104.
Nazim, M. (2018). Bibliometric Analysis of Gold Open Access in India. International Information & Library Review, 50(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2017.1326246.
Onyancha, O. B. (2021). Regional and international research collaboration and citation impact in selected sub-Saharan African countries in the period 2000 to 2019. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 70(6/7), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2020-0039.
Oviedo-García, M. Á. (2021). Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). Research Evaluation, 30(3), 405–419a. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab020.
Pečlin, S., Južnič, P., Blagus, R., Sajko, M. Č., & Stare, J. (2012). Effects of international collaboration and status of journal on impact of papers. Scientometrics, 93(3), 937–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0768-8.
Piwowar, H., Priem, J., & Orr, R. (2019). The Future of OA: A large-scale analysis projecting open access publication and readership. BioRxiv, 795310. https://doi.org/10.1101/795310.
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012.
Shideler, G. S., & Araújo, R. J. (2016). Measures of scholarly journal quality are not universally applicable to determining value of advertised annual subscription price. Scientometrics, 107(3), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1943-0.
Shu, F., & Larivière, V. (2024). The oligopoly of open access publishing. Scientometrics, 129(1), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04876-2.
Siler, K. (2020). Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(11), 1386–1401. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24339.
Sivertsen, G., Kulczycki, E., & Pölönen, J. (2019). The use of gold open access in four European countries: An analysis at the level of articles. In G. Catalano, C. Daraio, M. Gregori, H. F. Moed, & G. Ruacco (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 1600–1605). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_25.
Syahid, A. (2020). Open access journals in the member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 18(2), 33–49. https://ijism.isc.ac/article_698322.html.
Tennant, J. (2020). Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge. European Science Editing, 46: e51987. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2020.e51987.
Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-García, N., & Aguillo, I. F. (2016). Bibliometric and benchmark analysis of gold Open Access in Spain: big output and little impact. El Profesional de La Información, 25(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.ene.03.
UNESCO. (2023). Open Access. An open door to UNESCO’s knowledge. https://www.unesco.org/en/open-access.
van Leeuwen, T. N., Tatum, C., & Wouters, P. F. (2018). Exploring possibilities to use bibliometric data to monitor gold open access publishing at the national level. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(9), 1161–1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24029.
Velez-Estevez, A., García-Sánchez, P., Moral-Munoz, J.A., & Cobo, M.J. (2022). Why do papers from international collaborations get more citations? A bibliometric analysis of Library and Information Science papers. Scientometrics, 127, 7517–7555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04486-4.
Vera-Baceta, M. A., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z.
Wang, X., Cui, Y., Xu, S., & Hu, Z. (2018). The state and evolution of Gold open access: a country and discipline level analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(5), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2018-0023.
Wenaas, L., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2022). The green, gold grass of home: Introducing open access in universities in Norway. PLoS ONE, 17(8 August). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273091.
World Bank. (2024a). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP). World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD..ZS
World Bank. (2024b). World Bank country and lending groups. The World Bank. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.
Young, J. S., & Brandes, P. M. (2020). Green and gold open access citation and interdisciplinary advantage: A bibliometric study of two science journals. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(2), 102105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102105.
Zhang, L., & Watson, E. M. (2017). Measuring the impact of gold and green open access. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(4), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.00.4.
Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8.