MAHKAMAH SYARIAH DARI ABAD KE ABAD
Shariah Courts from Century to Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22452/syariah.vol29no3.2Keywords:
Sultan, Kadi, court, constitution, enacment, status, jurisdiction, conflict, Article 121(1A)Abstract
This is a brief glance at the development of the Shariah Court, originally known as the Kadi Court, throughout the Malay states. The research concentrates on the period of British colonisation and the period following the country’s independence. This study takes a qualitative approach by referencing published documents. The elements, as well as document comparisons, were thoroughly analysed. Interviews with people in positions of authority were also conducted in order to gather more data. The study focuses on numerous features of the Shariah Court, including the Sultan’s power to appoint Kadi/Judges, the status of Kadi, Court buildings, Court jurisdiction, conflict of jurisdiction, Article 121 (1A) Federal Constitution, and some Shariah Court-related concerns. There are some things that have not been investigated and recorded in the description of the given with great care, but have been examined reasonably extensively. This study would help to reorganise materials on the Shariah Court that have been scattered across several publications into a single publication for the benefit of those interested in learning more about the Shariah Court, particularly academics and researchers in the field of Islamic jurisprudence.
Downloads
References
Abdul Hamid Mohamad, ‘Artikel 121(1A): Sejauh Manakah Ianya Menyelesaikan Konflik Bidang Kuasa Antara Mahkamah Syariah dan Mahkamah Sivil,’ dalam Artikel 121 (1A) Perlembagaan Persekutuan, ed. Abdul Monir Yaacob & Nurul ‘Uyun Hj Zainal (Cyberjaya: Universiti Islam Malaysia, 2017), 91-100.
Abdul Monir Yaacob, An Introduction to Malaysian Law (Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 1989).
Abdul Monir Yaacob, An Introduction to Malaysian Law (Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 1989).
Abdul Monir Yaacob, Islam dan Kebebasan Beragama Menurut Perlembagaan Persekutuan (Kuala Lumpur: Yayasan Ilmuan, 2012).
Abdul Monir Yaacob, Kehakiman Islam dan Mahkamah Syariah (Cyberjaya: UIM, 2015).
Abdul Monir Yaacob, Perkembangan Pentadbiran Undang-Undang Islam di Malaysia (Cyberjaya: UIM, 2016).
Abdul Monir Yaacob, ‘Kesan Pindaan RUU 355,’ dalam Artikel 121 (1A) Perlembagaan Persekutuan, ed. Abdul Monir Yaacob & Nurul ‘Uyun Hj Zainal (Cyberjaya: Universiti Islam Malaysia, 2017), 153-166.
Ahmad Mohamed Ibrahim, Pentadbiran Undang-Undang Islam di Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit IKIM, 1997).
Ahmad Mohamed Ibrahim, The Administration of Islamic Law in Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur: IKIM, 2000).
Ahmad Mohamed Ibrahim, Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam di Malaysia (Singapore: Malayan Law Journal, 1999).
Ahmad Mohamed Ibrahim, ‘Pindaan kepada Perlembagaan 121 Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan Kesannya kepada Pentadbiran Undang-undang Islam,’ Jurnal Hukum, vol. 7/2 (1991): 129.
Clifford H., ‘Expedition: Terengganu and Kelantan,’ Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, vol. 34/1 (1961).
Farid Sufian Shuaib, Power and Jurisdiction of Syariah Courts in Malaysia (Singapore: Malayan Law Journal, 2003).
Hickling R.H., ‘The Origin of the Malay Bench,’ Malaya Law Review Legal Essays (1975).
Hooker M.B., Adat Law in Modern Malaya (Kuala Lumpur: OUP, 1976).
Mahamad Naser Disa, ‘Cadangan Untuk Meningkatkan Had Bidang Kuasa Kesalahan Jenayah Syariah,’ dalam Kompilasi Kertas Kerja Persidangan Penyelarasan Undang-undang Syarak dan Sivil, vol. 3 (Putrajaya: JAKIM, 2014).
Maxwell & Gibs, Treaties and Engagements Affecting the Malay States and Borneo (London, Suffolk Lane, E. C.: Jas. Truscott, 1924).
Mohamed Azam Mohamed Adil, Khayalan atau Realiti? (Kuala Lumpur: IIAS, Ilham Books, 2018).
Moshe Yeger, Islam and Islamic Institutions in British Malaya (Jerusalam: The Hebrew University, 1979), 152.
Muhammad Kamil Awang, Sultan & Perlembagaan (Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 2001).
Noor Aziah Mohd Awal, Pengantar Kepada Sistem Perundangan di Malaysia (Petaling Jaya: International Law Book Services, 2004).
Roff W. R., Kelantan, Religion, Society and Politics in A Malay State (Kuala Lumpur: OUP, 1974).
Sadka E., The Protected Malay States (Kuala Lumpur: UM Press, 1970).
Sheikh Ghazali Abdul Rahman, ‘Perkembangan Terkini Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia,’ dalam Sistem Kehakiman Islam (Kuala Lumpur: IKIM, 2001).
Shellabear W.G., Sejarah Melayu (Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti, 1981).
Sulaiman Daud, ‘Penyelarasan Undang-undang Berhubung dengan Peguam Syarie,’ dalam Kompilasi Kertas Kerja Persidangan Penyelarasan Undang-undang Syarak dan Sivil, vol. 2 (Putrajaya: JAKIM, 2013).
Statut
Courts Enactment, 1905.
Courts Enactment, 1914.
Courts Ordinance, 1948
Courts Enactment, Terengganu, 1921 Enakmen Majlis Agama Islam dan Adat Melayu Perlis, 1949.
Enakmen Mahkamah 1911, Johor.
Enakmen Mahkamah 1900, Perak
Enakmen Pentadbiran Hukum Syarak negeri Selangor, 1952.
Malayan Union Ordinance 1948.
Muhammaden Customs Ordinance, 1914.
Perlembagaan Persekutuan.
Sarawak, North Borneo and Brunei, Order in Council,1951.
Kedah Annual Report,1909
Terengganu Annual Report 1914-1917.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved. Not allowed to be reproduced any part of articles and contents of this journal in any form or by any way, whether electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without permission in writing from the Chief Editor, Jurnal Syariah.
